The New American asked in 2019 Greenpeace co-founder, Dr. Patrick Moore, about his thoughts on Net Zero and the Green New Deal. The answer was shocking but may today be more up to date than ever. The case is Net Zero Cannibalism.
Patrick Moore:
“Why would anyone vote for something that was going to result in the death of nearly all humans on Earth?”.
“It would basically begin a process of cannibalisation amongst the human species, because the food could not be delivered to the stores in the middle of the cities anymore.”
In an exclusive interview by Alex Newman with The New American, Greenpeace Co-Founder Patrick Moore vehemently criticized the “Green New Deal” proposed by congressional Democrats, deeming it a “recipe for mass suicide” and dubbing it the “most ridiculous scenario I ever heard.”
Dr. Moore went further to caution that the “completely preposterous” measures outlined in the plan, if enacted, could drive Americans to resort to cannibalism in a desperate attempt to stave off starvation, a situation he deemed unsurvivable.
The dire warnings extended beyond Moore’s perspective, as other experts, including Craig Rucker, the executive director of the environmental group Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), echoed concerns about the proposed “green” initiative in Congress.
Rucker drew parallels to Soviet five-year plans, characterizing the Green New Deal as a “prescription for disaster” that could have far-reaching and catastrophic consequences.
The full interview: Green New Deal a “Recipe for Mass Suicide,” Says Greenpeace Co-Founder
Net Zero Cannibalism in Sweden
In 2019 SVT the government-funded Swedish public service TV promoted neo-cannibalism as the solution to the climate threat, sustainability, and atmospheric carbon dioxide issues.
On the same day, Swedish Channel 4 (TV4.se) interviewed Magnus Söderlund a behavioural scientist and professor in marketing, about eating human flesh. He claimed the importance of seriously looking into the possibility for humans to eat dead humans. He addresses the taboos.
“The first thing is that this human that is to be eaten has to be dead. It’s kind of normal when one eats humans, and dead humans already is a taboo in itself even though that notion is tampered with, in the sense that people kill each other pretty wildly…”
Magnus Söderlund goes on to say these problems could hinder people who want to break into the human flesh market. At the end of the interview, he maintains the seriousness of human flesh-eating since this could be the solution for sustainability and climate issues.
What about the kids?
The subject was laughed at in 2019, but today in 2023 some people may not be sure.
Many ethical, economic and practical questions emerge in the wake of this move by flesh-eating predecessors. Who may eat whom? Can family members eat their own? What would be the price for human flesh? Will there be price differences depending on the quality and age of the body donator? Would the dead body of a Swedish prime minister be available on the open flesh market? And what about the kids?
Related
- The New American on Odysee
- NewsVoice on Odysee
- #NetZeroCannibalism