Neo-cannibalism “promoted” by Swedish State Television

I can´t help believing that this is a test for checking the mental state of the Swedish population, comparable to H&M´s introduction of sexy underwear for three year old girls some years ago. That ended in massive protests from parents, and I think the conclusion was that the population was not yet mature for feeding pedophilia – “some more years are needed for controversial products like that”.

Some years ago I stated a concept – “the internalized blame for everything”, meaning that people accept and embrace guilt laid upon them because they are brainwashed to think that the state can´t be wrong. So if the “climate change” is due to man, the need for cannibalism the Swedish people themselves are to blame. Let us not forget that Sweden is a laboratory for the globalists because of the weak souls identifying with the collective mass and globalist controlled government. An idea like this could not have been introduced in any other state.

Overton window 9/12/2019, 3:29:18 PM “A professor at the Stockholm Higher School of Economics, Magnus Soderlund, speaking on Swedish television as a guest expert on the future food, said eating human meat would help combat the effects of global climate change. Because cows and pigs produce too much methane, and feed requires too much land and water. Well, then – you yourself know. No, the professor does not call for eating living people, God forbid! But now the dead – why not? Moreover, for their burial, again, too much land is required. “I specifically named the column in such a way that, firstly, to anticipate possible comments, and secondly, so as not to return to the question. Overton’s window, along with Occam’s razor, is Rockefeller and Rothschild of contemporary sofa discourse. The concepts are captured, greasy and blurred to such an extent that as soon as you see their use – you want to immediately stop any discussion. For nothing. Because in the story with the Swedish professor, who suggested there are people in order to feed humanity, the most interesting is not at all in the breadth of the discussion. There can be no framework in scientific and natural discussions. And if such a framework existed, then mankind would not have nuclear weapons. True, perhaps it seems to some that this would be good. Well, OK. Ok, let’s add context. So, a professor at the Stockholm Higher School of Economics Magnus Soderlund, speaking on Swedish television as a visiting expert on the future food, said eating human meat would help fight the effects of global climate change. Because cows and pigs produce too much methane, and feed requires too much land and water. Well, then – you yourself know. No, the professor does not call for eating living people, God forbid! But now the dead – why not? Moreover, for their burial, again, too much land is required. To the question: “And you yourself, professor, will you eat people?” – the professor replied that he was open to suggestions. And while compatriot Greta Thunberg hasn’t spoken on the issue (and after all, one of the journalists must ask her what she thinks about this), let’s try to ignore the scope of the discussions, from the discussions themselves, from the Swedish cultural model as such to our plebeian sources. For example, to Wikipedia. So, in Wikipedia it is said that… Read more »