Yanis Varoufakis, a former Finance Minister of Greece, celebrates Lula’s victory over Bolsonaro in the Brazilian 2026 elections.
By Yanis Varoufakis
”I cannot for the life of me justify why Brazil’s courts had to demand of Bolsonaro that he hand over his passport the moment he lost the election. That he disputed the veracity of the election result is a sign of a faulty character, evidence that he is a bad loser. BUT, he had every right to be a bad loser; to dispute, rightly or wrongly, any result.
As for the argument that he was being investigated for other misdemeanors or crimes, that doesn’t wash either: What would have happened if Bolsonaro had won the election? Would the judges also prevent him from traveling abroad, as President-elect? I very much doubt that – which means that the judges were conflating executive and judicial powers.
To those who tell me that the Bolsonaro clan is a fascist, criminal family, my reply is: You and I may very well think that. Alas, the judiciary has no right to use its powers to indict and to pursue someone because – or immediately after – they lost an election. It is shameful, to be precise.
And it is also dangerous for those of us on the left who know what it means to be banned and hounded by rogue judges and police commissioners.
But I also have a message to Bolsonaro supporters, or those sitting on the fence, who assume that Lula is somehow behind the judges. He is not! This is the same court that imprisoned, falsely, Lula himself.
What we have in Brazil is a judiciary that overreaches and habitually crosses the line that ought to separate judicial from political power. It is such a shame that a judge took it upon himself to go after Bolsonaro on the eve of his defeat and, in doing so, to sully Lula’s stupendous victory.
One last point that my comrades in Brazil should note: If Bolsonaro and Rubio wanted to mount a campaign against Lula and Brazilian democracy, they could never have been aided better than by that judge’s reckless writ.”
