Dr David Martin explains alleged properties of the corona virus vaccine

NewsVoice är en oberoende nättidning med utgivningsbevis som startade 2011. Syftet är att publicera nyheter, debattartiklar, kommentarer och analyser. Stöd vårt arbete genom att donera, sponsra (tex granskningar, utlandsreportage) eller annonsera.
publicerad 6 januari 2021
- NewsVoice redaktion
Dr David Martin explains alleged properties of the corona virus vaccine

VACCINE DEBATE. The claims that are made in this extracted summary from a video recorded on January 5:th 2021 may be experienced as highly controversial. Dr David Martin is not a medical expert but a financial adviser previously working for the United States Departments of the Treasury and Commerce. Nevertheless he claims he has found the true purpose of the corona virus vaccine made by Moderna. NewsVoice is open for a free debate and scrutiny of these claims.

Disclaimer: NewsVoice.se has not researched the claims made. The purpose of publishing this extract is to stimulate further investigations into the subject of corona virus vaccines and their effectiveness, safety and purpose.

Video extract from a longer video (2 hours and 10 minutes). Video Source: New Earth Pulse | Image: Dr David Martin (biography). Press photo: Davidmartin.world. Text extracted by Reclaim Your Lives

Statement by Dr. David Martin on Jan 5th 2021

”Let’s make sure we are clear… This is not a vaccine. They are using the term “vaccine” to sneak this thing under public health exemptions. This is not a vaccine.”

”This is mRNA packaged in a fat envelope that is delivered to a cell. It is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator. It is not a vaccine. Vaccines actually are a legally defined term under public health law; they are a legally defined term under CDC and FDA standards [1]. And the vaccine specifically has to stimulate both the immunity within the person receiving it and it also has to disrupt transmission.

And that is not what this is. They (Moderna and Pfizer) have been abundantly clear in saying that the mRNA strand that is going into the cell is not to stop the transmission, it is a treatment. But if it was discussed as a treatment, it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health authorities because then people would say, “What other treatments are there?”

The use of the term vaccine is unconscionable for both the legal definition and also it is actually the sucker punch to open and free discourse… Moderna was started as a chemotherapy company for cancer, not a vaccine manufacturer for SARSCOV2. If we said we are going to give people prophylactic chemotherapy for the cancer they don’t yet have, we’d be laughed out of the room because it’s a stupid idea. That’s exactly what this is. This is a mechanical device in the form of a very small package of technology that is being inserted into the human system to activate the cell to become a pathogen manufacturing site.

And I refuse to stipulate in any conversations that this is in fact a vaccine issue. The only reason why the term is being used is to abuse the 1905 Jacobson case that has been misrepresented since it was written. And if we were honest with this, we would actually call it what it is: it is a chemical pathogen device that is actually meant to unleash a chemical pathogen production action within a cell. It is a medical device, not a drug because it meets the CDRH definition of a device. It is not a living system, it is not a biologic system, it is a physical technology – it happens to just come in the size of a molecular package.

So, we need to be really clear on making sure we don’t fall for their game. Because their game is if we talk about it as a vaccine then we are going to get into a vaccine conversation but this is not, by their own admission, a vaccine. As a result it must be clear to everyone listening that we will not fall for this failed definition just like we will not fall for their industrial chemical definition of health. Both of them are functionally flawed and are an implicit violation of the legal construct that is being exploited. I get frustrated when I hear activists and lawyers say, “we are going to fight the vaccine”. If you stipulate it’s a vaccine you’ve already lost the battle. It’s not a vaccine. It is made to make you sick.

80% of the people exposed to SARSCOV2 are asymptomatic carriers. 80% of people who get this injected into them experience a clinical adverse event. You are getting injected with a chemical substance to induce illness, not to induce an immuno-transmissive response. In other words, nothing about this is going to stop you from transmitting anything. This is about getting you sick and having your own cells be the thing that get you sick.

When the paymaster for the distribution of information happens to be the industry that’s doing the distributing, we lose. Because the only narrative is the one that will be compensated by the people writing the check. That goes for our politicians… and our media – it has been paid for – if you follow the money you realize there is no non-conflicted voice on any network.”

Statement by Dr. David Martin on Jan 5th 2021

References

[1] ”The word “vaccine” originates from the Latin Variolae vaccinae (cowpox), which Edward Jenner demonstrated in 1798 could prevent smallpox in humans. Today the term ‘vaccine’ applies to all biological preparations, produced from living organisms, that enhance immunity against disease and either prevent (prophylactic vaccines) or, in some cases, treat disease (therapeutic vaccines)”. Source: Phrma-jp.org

What is mRNA according to Moderna?

”Messenger RNA, or mRNA, plays a fundamental role in human biology, transferring the instructions stored in DNA to make the proteins required in every living cell. Our approach is to use mRNA medicines to instruct a patient’s own cells to produce proteins that could prevent, treat, or cure disease.”Moderna Inc.

Donera till NewsVoice

Du kan stötta Newsvoice via MediaLinq

  • Nu nästan 1/2 år senare har Dr. Martin haft en över 1 time lång diskussion med Dr Fuellmich ( Advokat som samlar bevis för att kunna stämma alla som är inblandat i hela Covid- Sars 2 bedrägeri) Interview finns på Bitchute och jag har försökt att lägger ut det på facebook men blev naturligtvis direkt blockerad. I detta samtal kartlägger Dr Martin att iden på Covid pandemin föddes 2002 efter Antrax angreppet i USA. det finns 4000 patent på Covid och sedan 2005 har man utvecklad Viruset som ett biologisk vapen där finns det 170 patent. ( då han arbeta med patentinstitutet har han alla bevis skriftligen och de personer och industrier som är inblandat i det hela.) De ovanstående yttringar av Dr Martin är en koncise sammanfattning vad hela Pandemin och vaccinationen går ut på. Då världen har blivit så effektiv bedragen ter sig hans yttringar här märkliga och föga trovärdig men tyvärr är detta sant och för dem som fortfarande inte tro på det kommer verkligheten inpå inom de näste 1-2 år.

  • Nu nästan 1/2 år senare har Dr. Martin haft en över 1 time lång diskussion med Dr Fuellmich ( Advokat som samlar bevis för att kunna stämma alla som är inblandat i hela Covid- Sars 2 bedrägeri) Interview finns på Bitchute och jag har försökt att lägger ut det på facebook men blev naturligtvis direkt blockerad. I detta samtal kartlägger Dr Martin att iden på Covid pandemin föddes 2002 efter Antrax angreppet i USA. det finns 4000 patent på Covid och sedan 2005 har man utvecklad Viruset som ett biologisk vapen där finns det 170 patent. ( då han arbeta med patentinstitutet har han alla bevis skriftligen och de personer och industrier som är inblandat i det hela.) De ovanstående yttringar av Dr Martin är en koncise sammanfattning vad hela Pandemin och vaccinationen går ut på. Då världen har blivit så effektiv bedragen ter sig hans yttringar här märkliga och föga trovärdig men tyvärr är detta sant och för dem som fortfarande inte tro på det kommer verkligheten inpå inom de näste 1-2 år.

  • RT (9 Jan, 2021): ‘Our people won’t be a testing device’: Tehran bans trials of foreign vaccines on Iranians

    ”Tehran has rejected attempts by foreign companies to test their coronavirus vaccines on Iranians, President Hassan Rouhani said, adding that the country will purchase safe immunization for its population.

    “Foreign companies wanted to give us vaccines so they would be tested on the Iranian people. But the health ministry prevented it,” Rouhani told state TV, without naming the producers that tried contacting the government in Tehran.”

    https://www.rt.com/news/512019-iran-coronavirus-vaccine-rouhani/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Email

  • RT (9 Jan, 2021): ’Our people won’t be a testing device’: Tehran bans trials of foreign vaccines on Iranians

    ”Tehran has rejected attempts by foreign companies to test their coronavirus vaccines on Iranians, President Hassan Rouhani said, adding that the country will purchase safe immunization for its population.

    ”Foreign companies wanted to give us vaccines so they would be tested on the Iranian people. But the health ministry prevented it,” Rouhani told state TV, without naming the producers that tried contacting the government in Tehran.”

    https://www.rt.com/news/512019-iran-coronavirus-vaccine-rouhani/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Email

  • Lämna ett svar