Dr. Paul Thomas Loses License after Publishing Largest Study on Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated Children

publicerad 10 februari 2022
- Aga Wilson
Aga Wilson and Dr. Paul Thomas (own works)

HEALTH & VACCINES. In this episode, Dr. Paul Thomas and I talk about his published and peer-reviewed study on vaccinated vs unvaccinated children from his practice and how he lost his license five days after the study was published.

We also talk about the war on informed consent and what it means to inform patients about the risks and benefits and how that has been highly ignored, especially when it comes to the covid vaccine.

We talk about the covid vaccine and the side effects and adverse reactions that have been reported in great numbers and the complete silence from mainstream media. Dr. Paul Thomas points out that there is a bigger agenda because these types of methods, like covid passports, have nothing to do with public health strategies.

Dr. Paul:

“The time has come to take our health and that of our children into our own hands.

Gone are the days when you could blindly follow your doctor’s recommendations or count on your health plan or some government agency to put your best interests first.

We owe it to ourselves and our children to remain constantly educated and informed so that we can make the best health decisions for ourselves and our families.”

Dr. Paul Thomas and his fight for medical freedom

After publishing the world’s largest peer-reviewed, Vaxxed – Unvaxxed study from real-world data in his practice on Nov 23rd, 2020 The Oregon Medical Board (OMB) Responded by emergently revoking his medical license.

”I lost my license 5 days after this study was available online on December 3rd, 2020. It was reinstated with restrictions on June 3rd and I get my day in court in November 2022! My fundraiser to support the legal battle and all my work is DrPaulsFight.com.”

He responded by starting his new weekly show: “Against the Wind” which can be found at Doctorsandscience.com.

The past 3 years The OMB – has relentlessly brought false charges and claims against him that his book, his research, and his honoring informed consent is a violation of the standard of care!

He faced a 2 week-long trial in January with projected costs in excess of $250,000. This fight is not just for his medical license but for medical freedom and humanity: DrPaulsFight.com. This is our fight and Dr. Paul has vowed to fight on to victory (but cannot do it alone).

By Aga Wilson | Aga Wilson Show

Donate to Aga Wilson Show

[email-subscribers-form id=”3″]

About Dr. Paul Thomas

  • Board Certified Pediatrician from 1991–2021
  • Board Certified in Addiction Medicine 2010-2021
  • Pediatrician whose clinic – Integrative Pediatrics – cares for 10–15,000 children
  • His book, The Vaccine-Friendly Plan, was published in 2016 by Ballantine Books.
  • His book, The Addiction Spectrum – A Compassionate, Holistic Approach to Recovery, was published by Harper One, in 2018.
  • His book, COVID-19: Life-Saving Strategies The News Media Will Never Tell You (was banned on amazon so he self-published at Smashwords)
  • Dr. Paul has over 1.5 million subscribers on his YouTube channel.

Dr. Paul Thomas’ articles

Donera till NewsVoice

Du kan stötta Newsvoice via MediaLinq

  • .24%?? My 2 kids have had zero vax. But we’re American living in Europe now. I think America has a 1% home birth rate so I would have expected a higher unvaccinated rate.

  • .24%?? My 2 kids have had zero vax. But we’re American living in Europe now. I think America has a 1% home birth rate so I would have expected a higher unvaccinated rate.

  • Varför står det i rubriken ”vaccinated vs unvaccinated” när studien jämför 3 olika grader av aluminiumhalt i 3 olika vaccinationsprogram? Har jag missat något?

  • Varför står det i rubriken ”vaccinated vs unvaccinated” när studien jämför 3 olika grader av aluminiumhalt i 3 olika vaccinationsprogram? Har jag missat något?

  • eating oils unless olive oils (easily extracted) is not normal, chemical/industrial process needed, used as lubricants for machines before marketed as ’foods’, status: risky
    conclusion: lard and animal fats and some olive oils seems safest bet, heartattacks wasn’t normal before vegetable oils started being used

  • eating oils unless olive oils (easily extracted) is not normal, chemical/industrial process needed, used as lubricants for machines before marketed as ’foods’, status: risky
    conclusion: lard and animal fats and some olive oils seems safest bet, heartattacks wasn’t normal before vegetable oils started being used

    • Tack för denna långa lista.Man kan ladda ner hela listan som pdf – vilket jag gjort. Otroligt bra information att kunna sticka under näsan på hjärntvättade personer som bara accepterar peer-reviewed studies. Detta kom just i rättan tid för mej! Tack igen!

    • Tack för denna långa lista.Man kan ladda ner hela listan som pdf – vilket jag gjort. Otroligt bra information att kunna sticka under näsan på hjärntvättade personer som bara accepterar peer-reviewed studies. Detta kom just i rättan tid för mej! Tack igen!

  • Lämna ett svar