David Jonstad föreläser 6/3: Dags att rusta för global kollaps?

    1
    292

    FÖREDRAG

    ABF-Huset i Stockholm: Tisdag 6 mars. Kl 18.15. ABF-huset. Sveavägen 41. Entré 50 kr.

    I fem tusen år har människan byggt civilisationer, en samhällsform som kan skapa bestående underverk men också vara förödande för grunden till vår överlevnad: naturen. Inte minst gäller detta vår egen industriella civilisation.

    Frågan är hur länge den nuvarande utvecklingen kan pågå. Kommer vi att följa i spåren på romarriket och mayaimperiet och hur kommer i så fall framtiden att se ut? David Jonstad berättar utifrån sin bok Kollaps. Livet vid civilisationens slut om vad som får en civilisation på fall och hur vi genom samarbete, kreativitet och solidaritet kan skapa ett gott liv även i framtiden.

    davidjonstad.se

     
    • NewsVoice kräver äkta för- och efternamn för den som vill kommentera efter artiklar. Varför?
    • I kommentarsfältet har varje person ansvar för sin egen kommentar. Kommentarer som bryter mot kommentarsreglerna eller svensk lag kan tas bort eller ändras.
    • Donera gärna till NewsVoice, en gratistidning som är beroende av läsarnas stöd. Pengarna går till undersökande och oberoende journalistik.

    1 KOMMENTAR

    1. There is evidence that the key to recovering after brain damage is a tolerant, flexible environment, and brain plasticity may have something to do with epigenetics (reference:1). There is actually evidence that brains are better at epigenetics than other organs:
      mammalian brain neurons can rewrite the genetic code itself and the process is especially
      efficient in humans (references: 2 and 3). Paleontologists have long been puzzled
      by the fossil evidence for an acceleration in brain evolution. The explanation may be that the more
      plastic the brain already was, the better it was att improving its own plasticity epigenetically. Karl
      Popper argued that since the environment was variable, it posed variable problems that was best
      solved by understanding the mechanisms behind without prejudice, and that was why
      consciousness evolved. Sadly, Karl Popper died in 1994, so he never had a chance to learn about
      epigenetics, although it fits well into his theory. The theory that our big, complex brains evolved
      not because everyday life was complex but to appropriately change mind when the environment
      changes has been ridiculed because under traditional genetic theories, it could not explain why
      other animals have not progressed even nearly as far towards science as humans have. But if
      epigenetics are factored in, however, it can be explained by the feedback loop effect, that more
      efficient epigenetics were better at improving itself. Thereby follows that random mutations were
      very important early in evolution but gradually lost their importance, which explains why there are
      no racist-style differences today. Considering that climate change, dwindling natural resources
      and advanced weapons are major threats caused by irrational decisions, it may be time to use
      neuroplasticity research to improve rational thought throughout the population, not only on
      patients. Judging from your research, it seems that the best course to improve rationality is to
      avoid pressure to make up justifications (justifications paralyses self-improvement) and instead
      create reassurances that admitting mistakes does not mean a loss of prestige. Even Karl Popper
      complained at the malign influence prestige had in the history of science. I also have an idea that
      rearranging grammar so that the reason comes before the conclusion can help rationality. I blog
      at theascentofepigenetics.blogspot.

      1.Mind, Brain and Education.

      2.”Aneuploid neurons are functionally active and integrated into
      brain circuitry”

      3.”How many genomes do you have?”

      Martin J Sallberg.

    KOMMENTERA [Se kommentarsregler]

    Vänligen ange din kommentar!
    Vänligen ange ditt namn här