Dr Mercola: “Attacks on Health Reporters and Their Readers Are Escalating”

publicerad 18 september 2013
- av News@NewsVoice
Dr Joseph Mercola. Pressfoto

Truth becomes treason in an empire of lies. Attacks against health web sites like yours truly and others, and our readers—yes, that would be you—are rapidly escalating.

Thinly veiled threats are issued not just by industry spokespersons (many of whom hide their industry ties from their readers), but also international organizations like UNICEF. It’s become very evident, very quickly, that now more than ever, we need your support to counter the increasingly dirty tactics of these industry players.

Simply by reporting the scientific evidence—which is published in peer-reviewed journals, mind you—I’ve been labeled as a top “anti-vaccine influencer” for my pro-safety stance on vaccines, and a “media supporter of domestic eco-terrorists” for my reporting on the hazards of Roundup and genetically engineered foods.

Why Is UNICEF Accusing Health Journalists of Lying?

A recently published report 1 by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) reveals that the organization is tracking “the rise of online pro-vaccine safety sentiments in Central and Eastern Europe,” and has identified the most influential pro-vaccine safety influencers” on the web.

UNICEF included me on the list, along with other independent health websites like GreenMedInfo.com, Mothering.com and NaturalNews.com, just to name a few. In their opening reference, they use a quote by Mark Twain that reads:

“A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.”

Clearly, UNICEF is inferring that I and other vaccine-safety advocates are lyingabout the situation and therefore should be ignored. This would be hilarious if it wasn’t so serious.

Here we have an international organization supposedly dedicated to children’s health and wellbeing, and instead of addressing the ample scientific evidence showing the potential harm of vaccines, they’re entering into ever-deepening partnerships with vaccine company giants like Merck 2 and GlaxoSmithKline 3 (GSK).

They spend precious time and resources on public relations schemes to convince you to ignore any science that raises questions about the wisdom of “carpet-bombing” infants’ and young children’s immune systems with potentially harmful vaccines.

UNICEF’s Bedfellows

This is especially disturbing because Merck has been involved in numerous criminal scandals and class-action lawsuits in recent years, including fraudulently marketing its deadly drug Vioxx; lying about the true efficacy of its mumps vaccine and engaging in scientific fraud (a charge brought by its own scientists); and hiding critical side effects associated with its osteoporosis drug Fosamax, just to name a few of the most publicized.

Additionally, they engaged in scientific fraud (a charge brought by its own scientists); and hiding critical side effects associated with its osteoporosis drug Fosamax, just to name a few of the most publicized.

Even more shocking, in 2009, it was revealed that Merck actually had a hit list of doctors to be “neutralized” or discredited for voicing critical opinions about the pain killer Vioxx—a drug that indeed ended up killing more than 60,000 people before it was pulled from the market.

Two years later, in 2011, the company ended up pleading guilty to a criminal charge over the fraudulent marketing and sales of this deadly drug.4 But sure, let’s listen to UNICEF and trust the guys who go so far as to threaten the lives of those who question the safety of a very factually dangerous drug. Then there’s GSK, whose leadership among corporate criminals is illustrious indeed.

Not only was GSK found guilty in the largest health fraud settlement in US history just last year, for which they were fined $3 billion. A couple of months ago, Chinese authorities accused the company of bribery and illegal marketing schemes. Chinese police claim to possess evidence showing that bribery has been a “core part” of GSK China’s business model since 2007.

Doctors and government officials are said to have received perks such as travel, cash, and sexual favors that when combined, amounted to nearly $5 billion, according to some reports. The company allegedly used travel agencies as middlemen to carry out these illegal acts. Four Chinese GSK executives have so far been detained on charges of cash and sexual bribery.

GSK also spent more than 10 years covering up information that proved they knew about the serious health dangers of their blockbuster diabetes drug Avandia, as it would adversely affect sales. While carousing with the true liars and criminals, UNICEF deems it fitting to paint me and other health journalists as the liars; the ones leading you astray.

Little does UNICEF realize that by publicizing a list of monitored “vaccine influencers”—the health reporters who stick pegs in the wheels of their crafty PR schemes by publishing all those studies the vaccine industry would rather see buried—they’ve basically given you a Who’s Who of real vaccine information.

Read more


Så här kan du stötta Newsvoice

  • Det finns faktiskt mycket som pekar på att det är “begåvat” att undvika kolhydraterna så långt det nu är möjligt – dvs. betrakta dem som ett gift för kroppen – och här är några goda skäl även om det nu en gång för alla inte är lätt att avstå från denna drog.

    1. Kolhydrater är det enda näringsämne vi inte behöver.

    2. Kroppen tillverkar själv den ringa mängd blodsocker den behöver från fett och protein i levern och njurarna.

    3. Om vi inte kunde framställa insulin skulle vi omedelbart dö i akut blodsockerförgiftning efter en normal kolhydratstinn måltid.

    4. Insulinet räddar oss från akut död i kolhydratförgiftnings men har mängder av obehagliga metabola biverkningar och man kanske skulle kunna kalla insulinet för en giftig kompanjon till kolhydraterna.

    5. Utan kolhydrater hamnar vi i det förnäma ketogena tillståndet och är man mindre begåvad kan då trösta sig med att hjärnan nu fungerar ungefär 25% bättre än om den går på ren glykos. Man kanske därför skulle kunna säga att den svenska befolkningens genomsnittliga intelligenskvot skulle kunna öka ungefär så mycket om alla övergav kolhydraterna och vi ligger idag här ganska långt framme i en global jämförelse.

    6. Vad som ytterligare talar för det lämpliga att betrakta kolhydrater som ett gift är att man kan bli så skadad av dem att man till slut hamnar i det metabola syndromet ungefär som en person som dricker stora mängder sprit under lång tid kan hamna i det alkoholsyndrom som kallas alkoholism. (En intressant jämförelse är att kolhydraten fruktos metaboliseras på ett nästan identiskt sätt i levern som alkohol och ger samma leverskador.)

    7. Som många gifter är kolhydrater också beroendeframkallande och vi som hamnat i det metabola syndromet kan intyga att de fungerar som en drog och som hos de flesta av oss ger upphov till akuta sjukdomssympton på samma sätt som alkohol hos de som blivit alkoholister.

    8. Hos sockersjuka har förgiftningen också gått så långt att hela metabolismen (= ämnesomsättningen) totalt havererat och sedan endast kan hållas igång med konstgjord andning (extra insulin) om man fortsätter med sin drog.


    Den här listan kan göras längre men den kan kanske duga som en introduktion till frågeställningen (punkterna är ursprungligt formulerade av professor Göran Sjöberg).

    – slut citat härifrån.

  • Lämna ett svar

    Din e-postadress kommer inte publiceras. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *