Dr. Robert Malone: The WEF is about Gaining Profit and Governmental Control via Corporatism

"In my opinion, in the case of those trainees and WEF members who are in politics in the USA, and particularly those who have been used to “penetrate the global cabinets of countries” should be forced to register as foreign agents within their host countries."

publicerad 11 april 2023
- Guest writer
Dr Robert Malone, pressfoto
Dr. Robert Malone

Those of us in this movement sometimes forget that for most people, the World Economic Forum (WEF) is a meeting in Davos where the rich and famous like to hang out once a year. They have no idea of what the WEF truly is about and what it has accomplished over the course of the last 50 years. Even those of us who follow the WEF can forget what their true mission is, and how deeply they are involved in crafting the new world order, ergo: The Great Reset.

By Dr. Robert Malone

The truth is that transnational companies want control of world governance. The Great Reset is a planned attempt to redistribute all the world’s wealth and power into the hands of corporations, billionaires, banks and most of all, the World Economic Forum’s leadership. The “Great Reset” plans to use the fourth industrial revolution to further their own ambitious plans of world dominance.

Industry 4.0

The Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) is a term used to refer to the next generation of technological advances; where it is anticipated that the differences between physical, digital, and biological technologies disappear.

This is a world where machines and computers evolve independently, where new biological entities and evolutionary changes are being controlled by artificial intelligence, and where brain waves can be manipulated. It is, quite literally, a brave new world.

It is a world where transhumanism has become a reality. The boundaries between man and machine are blurred. This is the world of nightmares, of a dystopian future of overloads and underlings; of the “technologically augmented” and the “normies.” Of physicals, virtuals, machines, and overlords.

What truly sets Industry 4.0 technologies apart is the novel way in which hardware, software, and connectivity are being reconfigured and integrated to achieve ever-more ambitious goals, the collection and analysis of vast amounts of data, the seamless interaction between smart machines, and the blurring of the physical and virtual dimensions of production (Industry Analytics Platform).

To get an idea of how the WEF is using Industry 4.0 now, take the example of smart cities. The WEF is using the threat of “climate change “to drive the development and State/business endorsement of smart cities. These are proposed to be run by the World Economic Forum, which is leading the G-20 to build a “Smart Cities Alliance on Technology Governance.”

The ability to track and control all peoples in a city, to control crime, carbon credits, food, transport, etc. is a future most do not wish to partake in. This is a future that forms the basis of the near-term dystopian Spielberg film “Minority Report”.

  • Yet, what choice do we underlings have?
  • Who gets to decide what is right and wrong when the infrastructure is being developed globally and implemented regionally with little or no transparency?
  • Is this just another case of “those with the Gold make the rules”?

Who are the globalist members of the trade organization known as The World Economic Forum (WEF) and the operatives that they have trained, why should you care, and what can you do about it?

Andrew Marshall developed a brief introductory summary which I strongly recommend reading, published in a 2015 article entitled “World Economic Forum: a history and analysis”.

The membership of the WEF is divided into three general categories:

The current 100 WEF full members (“Strategic Partners”) are basically drawn from the largest corporations in the world, together with their owners and managers, who are often referred to as Davos Man”.

The list of “strategic partners” reads like a list of the 100 most woke companies and organizations, which include:

  • the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,
  • Open Society Foundations,
  • Welcome Trust,
  • Blackrock,
  • Bain,
  • Microsoft,
  • Google – it goes on and on.

A full list of current Strategic Partners can be found here: WEF Industry Partners.

Some of the recent activities of the WEF.

What is the business model of the WEF?

The WEF is made up of the largest transnational organizations in the world. This is their lobbying organization.

They have basically built a political juggernaut based on advancing corporatist “public-private partnerships” with the US, WHO, EU, the five eyes nations (UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the USA), China/CCP as well as any other countries that will join in their cause (notably Russia has decided to WEFexit- leave the WEF).

The political science term “Fascism” has been so weaponized, abused, and overused that it has lost much of its utility to describe a category of political systems, but a strong case can be made that this form of corporatism is synonymous with the original intent of the term “Fascism”.

The WEF business model has been to enable its member corporations to create disruptive technologies that will drive markets and increase profits.

This is not about ESG, smart cities, climate change, or even human rights.

The WEF is about gaining governmental control via corporatism. The WEF is a trade organization of the largest transnational organizations in the world.

Never forget that fact as you read their endless stream of feel-good press releases from the various WEF outlets and acolytes.

The United Nations has played right into their hands. The strategic partnership between the two organizations has led to the control of worldwide regulatory processes for new technologies and for global governance.

The WEF paints its injection into global politics with pretty words, but the truth is – the WEF is about profit. Control politicians, control governments, control the new world order, and increase the profits and control of vital industries. The WEF is a monopolist’s dream organization, and a quick review of the Strategic Partners list reveals many of the most successful corporate monopolists in recorded history.

The Great Reset and Agenda 2030 are two sides of the same coin. The WEF and the UN are now both strategically and tactically one organization. Their agendas are intertwined. The “G20” is a creation of the WEF.

The WEF regionally

The WEF regional organizations and members do not act alone but have developed various groups of globally distributed trainees and graduates, who generally act in accordance with the detailed policies and positions developed and distributed by WEF leadership. The training programs have been operating for over three decades, resulting in the placement, distribution, and rapid advancement of many thousands of WEF-trained operatives throughout the world.

WEF chairman Klaus Schwab has famously claimed that these operatives have been strategically inserted into key positions in various governments, as well as influential positions in important industries such as media, finance, and technology.

The World Economic Forum even has a formal committee of university presidents. Who come together regularly to discuss and decide policy at the top universities in the world. These presidents are committed to supporting the World Economic Forum, whose main agenda is “stakeholder capitalism” – another word for corporatism.

Corporatism is a broad concept. It can run the gamut from the hyper-authoritarian version embraced by Mussolini’s Italy to worker-boss structures of the type described by Schwab in postwar Western Europe. All forms of corporatism, however, share some common themes.

One is the necessity of limiting market competition in order to preserve social cohesion. Another is mandating cooperation between representative groups of different social and economic sectors – a process overseen and, if necessary, enforced by government officials for the sake of the common good.

What, you might ask, could be wrong with this? The answer is plenty.

For a start, corporatism – including its Schwabian expression – isn’t big on freedom. It’s all about forming and then maintaining a consensus on economic and social policies. For this reason, corporatism doesn’t cope well with dissent. Indeed, it discourages any questioning of the consensus, whether the issue is tax rates or climate change.

The language of corporatism, like that of Schwab’s WEF, may be one of coordinated consultation, but the agenda is one of control. For what matters is the harmonization of views, no matter how absurd the idea and or how high the cost of liberty is.

Not only does this generate groupthink. It encourages the marginalization of those who dispute the consensus. If you have reservations about, say, open borders, don’t be surprised if you are branded a xenophobe. If you decline to have your workforce unionized, you’re likely to be labeled a market fundamentalist who treats his employees as mere objects.

Another problem is the collusion and cronyism fostered by corporatism. Corporatist structures facilitate client-patron relations between businesses and governments. That in turn produces insiders and outsiders.

Insiders are those companies who sign up to the consensus, play the corporatist game, and consequently do very well out of their cozy relationships with governments. Outsiders are those who lack the resources to grease the wheel. An example might be the young entrepreneur with a great idea that might revolutionize an entire economic sector but who doesn’t enjoy the political connections. Long-established companies rarely hesitate to use their connections to try and establish regulatory environments, which makes it hard for such entrepreneurs to compete in the marketplace.

Lastly, corporatist-style stakeholder capitalism is decidedly ambivalent about democracy. The emphasis is upon insiders negotiating with each other, and then presenting the populace with a series of faits accomplis about anything ranging from fossil fuels to ESG.

Who are the Young Global Leaders – trained and tasked with carrying out the “Great Reset”?

The Malone Institute, together with the Pharos Media group [Sweden] assembled a complete list of graduates from the 3-5 year program – this list goes back to the founding of the Young Global Leaders program, which is at least 40 years old.

The YGL graduate list has now been updated to include the most recent (2022) list of graduates.

The list of US politicians who are graduates can also be found here: WEF Graudate List

The Young Global Leaders have been trained to believe in and support a globalist form of unelected government, in which international business is at the center of the management and decision-making process.

They have been trained to advance the interests of a global transnational government which represents a public-private partnership in which the business interests of the WEF members take precedence over the constitution of the United States.

The WEF believes that the concept of independent nation-states is obsolete and must be replaced with a global government that controls all.

They are fundamentally anti-democratic, and their views are both fundamentally corporatist and globalist, which is another way of saying that they are for totalitarian Fascism – the fusion of the interests of business with the power of the state- on a global scale.

These graduates may not represent the interests of the nation-state in which they reside, work, and may hold political office, but rather their allegiance appears to be to the WEF vision of a dominant world government that has dominion over nations and their constitutions.

In my opinion, in the case of those trainees and WEF members who are in politics in the USA, and particularly those who have been used to “penetrate the global cabinets of countries” should be forced to register as foreign agents within their host countries.

“What we are very proud of, is that we penetrate the global cabinets of countries with our WEF Young Global Leaders. (YGL)”

[Read more in Newsvoice: Canadian Parliament Penetrated by Young Global Leaders According to Klaus Schwab (WEF)]

Why should you care?

The WEF has helped mastermind the globally harmonized planning, development, and implementation of the lockdowns, mandates, authoritarian vaccine campaigns, suppression of early treatment options, global targeting of dissenting physicians, censorship, propaganda, information, and thought control programs which we have all experienced since late 2019.

For instance, The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY.

The exercise built the public/private partnerships that allowed lockdowns, travel restrictions, censorship, vaccine passports, etc. to easily become the norm. These plans have not changed, in fact, more recent “war games” suggest an even heavier-handed response to the “next” public health crisis.

What can you do about it?

After all, you have seen and experienced since the Winter of 2020, please ask yourself these two questions:

  • Is this an organization that I can trust with my future and that of my children?
  • Do they represent my interests, values, and what I believe in?

If you decide that you cannot trust them, or that they do not share your interests and values, then it is time to act.

Some Suggestions:

  • Do not support politicians that have graduated from the Young Global Leaders Program and expose their affiliations through the use of social media.
  • Work to elect constitutionalists and small government advocates. That may include volunteering.
  • Fight any efforts by state and federal governments to create a “stakeholder” economy.
  • Support efforts to stymie public-private partnerships.
  • Bring awareness to the cause through social media.
  • Learn to be self-sufficient. Do not fall into the trap of being dependent on technology.
  • Do not allow yourself to fall deeply into debt.
  • Have redundant systems to survive.

I ask you, my subscribers – what other things do you do, what can we do, to prepare and exist as free people in a world increasingly dominated by globalist totalitarianism? How do we help save this country from falling under the control of the UN and the WEF? How do we, as a nation survive this onslaught?

By Dr. Robert Malone


Så här kan du stötta Newsvoice

Stöd NewsVoice 2024
  • 5G Primer var en allmän översikt av 5G och inget som helst bevis för att det har med vaccinet att göra

  • Jag fattar eftersom du framfört din uppfattning tidigare men det är fortfarande fel av rent tekniska orsaker. En noggrannare läsning av allt seriöst material leder till samma slutsats även om forskare ibland kan uttrycka sig braskande.

    • Ja du tycks ha uppfattat vad jag sagt om 5G och kommunikation med vaccinet. Och det är alltså rent tekniskt omöjligt det du tror. Det är därför 7x10mm stort plast-inbakat chip ingick som option vid vaccineringar. Men bara som option och sprutan för det ändamålet hade ett separat munstycke för chipen. Och den som uppfann det fick en kunglig utmärkelse efter vad jag minns.

  • Som vanligt går de flesta debattörer rakt i fällan. Man leds bort från det verkliga felet.
    Det monetära systemet. Det behövs inte. Det räcker med att vi hjälps åt globalt. Det finns så det räcker till alla. Om man skulle använda synonymer till WEF så blir det Mörker och Ondska.
    Grattis, Jordens folk!

  • Mycket ärlig och informerat artikel. Den som vill förkovra sig mera kan läsa boken ” Den diskreta Världsmakten” Så blev World ekonomic Forum världens mäktigaste lobbyorganisation. skriven av tyska journalisten Ernst Wolf. Numera översatt och utgiven av Karneval Förlag. Precis lika hårresande och informativ som Malones artikel. @disqus_G1HB7u2qNK:disqus har rätt vi kommer att gå raka vägen in i detta helvete om inte medborgarna vakna och gör den oblodiga revolutionen. Alternativet verkar blir The hunger games.” och vissa kommer ju att vakna för då.

  • Malone föredrar small government dvs den vanliga visan att bakom talet om frihet gömmer sig en avsikt att försvaga nationalstaterna. Small government betyder maktlöshet gentemot den privata oligarkin.
    Motarbeta private public private partnerships säger han. Hur då utan en stark statsmakt som kan styra den processen?

    • Malone skriver: “Work to elect constitutionalists and small government advocates.”
      Hur får du det till att han förespråkar en försvagning av nationalstaten? Om man försäkrar sig om att stödja konstitutionen så är det väl att förstärka förutsättningen för en nationalstat? Hur menar du annars det ska gå till?
      En stark statsmakt grundad i en konstitution av och för folket kan såklart med ett starkt folkligt stöd styra processen. Men i Sverige genomförs en massa förändringar (NATO medlemskap etc) UTAN att ens att låta folket säga sin mening.

      • Small government dvs en mäktig privat oligarki fortsätter att dominera precis som nu.
        Small government=makt-lös statsmakt= inget sätt att upprätthålla nationell självständighet.
        Menar man allvar med att företräda folket måste man ange hur man tänker agera gentemot den oligarkin som nu äger det mesta inklusive medierna. Vad har USAs konstitution hjälpt mot det som nu pågår?
        Till det kommer att anglosaxernas broderskap är ytterligare en stark maktfaktor som har mängder av agenter i många länder. Och som dominerar västländernas akademiska verksamhet.
        Vad gör man åt den anglosaxiska elitens särskilt vidsträckta tentakler?

        • Du tycks ha missförstått uttrycket “Small government”. Det betyder inte att oligarkin styr allt. Det betyder snarare att de (och staten) inte ska lägga sig i så mycket och låta folket själva bestämma. Det är samtidigt inte anarki. I USA är det som ligger närmast “Libertarian” som exempelvis Ron Paul och till viss det hans son Rand förespråkar. Dessutom är det utgångspunkten för den Amerikanska konstitutionen. Om du inbillar dig att en stark statsmakt som i kommunistiska länder på något sätt som helst skulle garantera folkets frihet så är du ute på djupt vatten. Ungefär som att inbilla sig att en stark världsregering typ WEF ska göra något bra för folket. Det behövs en mängd självständiga nationalstater, som Ungern exempelvis för att kunna förhindra det totala maktövertagandet.

          • Jo det betyder just att oligarkin styr allt därför att inget kan hindra oligarkin då.
            Anglosaxiska libertarianer försöker få dig att acceptera det tänkesättet och en av dem pekade ut Storbritannien under 1830-talet som gott exempel på small government. Den var så maktlös att det inte lönade sig att muta politikerna var fördelarna enligt den Tea-party ideologen. Och oligarkin i Storbritannien var då väl förankrad sen över ett århundrade. Dom pratar aldrig om Venedigs oligarki som var modellen för britterna och det var Venedigs oligarki som transplanterades till England.
            På 1700-talet hjälpte Benjamin Franklin britterna att utveckla infrastruktur men det fick inte pågå länge. Oligarkin gillar inte uppfinningsrika ingenjörer för såna hotar att växa upp som rivaler. Oligarkin har genomgående motarbetat nationbyggare. I USA Frankrike Tyskland Ryssland och Kina. Samtliga hade amerikanska förebilder och samtliga motarbetades av britterna som snart fick USA under sin kontroll.
            Typiskt för hur debatten förs i USA är att de träter om huruvida Andrew Jackson eller Alexander Hamilton var bra eller dåliga. Amerikanerna har inte ens någon intelligent konsensus om deras republik var av typen nationsbyggare eller brittiska landsförrädare. En nation där ideologerna har så svag analytisk förmåga kan du aldrig ha som en bra förebild!

  • Ett kortfattat svar på dina frågor är, antingen ställa sig i fållan som de andra fåren, eftersom de demokratiska spelreglerna är en chimär. Det enda alternativ som återstår är folkets makt d.v.s. en oblodig revolution?
    Vi, folket slänger ut parasiterna från Rosenbad och riksdagshus? Detsamma gör alla andra länder som inte följer medborgarnas intresse. Det betyder att, FN, WEF, EU, WHO, IMF och andra sidoorg. faller som korthus och i slutänden.
    även de som ärvt sina förfäders maktimperium och som parasiterat sig på mänskligheten de senaste seklerna tvingas inlemma sig i ledet. Det vi talar om är en Ny Världsordning, där 99,999 % av befolkningen är med och bestämmer sin egen framtid.

  • Lämna ett svar

    Din e-postadress kommer inte publiceras. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *