”After the fiascos of Syria, Libya and Iraq, the offensive of Hamas would be the new bait for the Machiavellian plan outlined by the Anglo-American alliance in 1960 to attract both Russia and China and provoke a major regional conflict”.
By Germán Gorraiz López, Political Analyst
Mossad operatives infiltrated Hamas allegedly sold the idea that the protests against the legal reform promoted by Netanyahu had had the collateral effect of the appearance of fissures in the areas of Israeli Defense and Intelligence, due to the refusal of a significant number of reservist soldiers to enter vital positions for the optimal functioning of the Israeli Defense and many of them grouped in the ”Brothers and Sisters in Arms” block.
Taking advantage of the alleged security holes in the Israeli Defense caused by the schism between the reservists and Netanyahu, the armed wing of the Islamist group Hamas, launched the largest military offensive since 2007.
With the infiltration of dozens of its members into Israeli localities and the launching of thousands of projectiles into large areas, including Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, it is not excluded that the offensive extends to the Lebanese and Syrian border with the entry on stage of Hezbollah and members of the Fatemiyoun Brigade, Shiite militia with organic dependence of the elite of the Iranian Armed Forces or Pasdars.
Israel would have implied that such an offensive had totally surprised him as he was celebrating his Autumn feasts.
Thus, in statements to Israeli Channel 12, the former Israeli security chief Amos Yadlin said that:
”there has been a surprise of intelligence and when you are surprised, the price is always high”.
But the reality is that it would only be a bait of the Mossad agents infiltrated into Hamas to facilitate an initial success of Hamas, the devastating response of the Israeli Army and the subsequent extension of that conflict to the entire Middle East.
Benjamin Netanyahu, using the invisible dictatorship of fear of the Third Holocaust, comes from Hamas, Hezbollah or Iran, and has taken the opportunity to declare a state of war (defence of Israel’s security) and unleash a devastating offensive in the Gaza Strip.
Netanyahu hopes for a quick victory that will give him an increase in popularity lost by his alleged legal reform and allow him to bypass the judicial process in which he is accused of bribery, fraud and breach of trust, but the Biden Administration will try to influence Netanyahu to avoid a new asymmetric punishment in Gaza that would destroy the entente between the US, Israel, Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia for a next attack on Iran.
Hamas success or Israel trap?
After the fiascos of Syria, Libya and Iraq, the offensive of Hamas would be the new bait for the Machiavellian plan outlined by the Anglo-American alliance in 1960 to attract both Russia and China and provoke a major regional conflict that would mark the evolution of the area in the coming years and that would be a new local episode that would be framed in the return to the recurring endemism of the cold war between the US and Russia.
Taking advantage of the fact that the strategic reserves of the US are at maximum and that the American shale industry has managed to soar due to the unbridled price of crude oil combined with the growing challenge to the American hegemony represented by the Chinese colossus, the Pentagon would have designed ”Operation Persia”.
The US would use an initial surprise attack by Israel on Iran to start a new war in the Middle East with the dual objective of drying up China’s energy sources and climbing its popularity index to be re-elected in the upcoming 2024 presidential election.
Thus, according to a report from the Veterans Today portal, ”Israel would be moving air defence weapons, long-range artillery, helicopters and F-15 fighter planes to Erbil, capital of Iraqi Kurdistan for a wider war against Iran” (Operation Persia). That could be triggered in the coming months.
Such a conflict could involve the three superpowers (US, China and Russia) counting as necessary collaborations with regional powers (Israel, Syria, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Iran) and would cover the geographical space that extends from the Mediterranean arc (Israel, Syria and Lebanon) to Yemen and Somalia with the avowed aim of designing the subsequent cartography of the New Middle East.
By Germán Gorraiz López, Political Analyst